I just can`t believe because someone is so sure of their faith
I agree that would be lacking. But, if someone walked out of a tomb, that would be a sufficient basis for believing what that person had to say.
let me explain :.
after the creation account of the bible, tribes of people and nations began to form and spread around the land.. god first chose noah and his family to protect them as he destroys all others in the flood.. and he ticks off everyone in babel ?
and then he favours abraham and his descendants as the nation of israel culminating in the jewish lineage to jesus the son of god.. he has never had any dealings with any other people`s or nation isn`t that some form of favouritism ?
I just can`t believe because someone is so sure of their faith
I agree that would be lacking. But, if someone walked out of a tomb, that would be a sufficient basis for believing what that person had to say.
let me explain :.
after the creation account of the bible, tribes of people and nations began to form and spread around the land.. god first chose noah and his family to protect them as he destroys all others in the flood.. and he ticks off everyone in babel ?
and then he favours abraham and his descendants as the nation of israel culminating in the jewish lineage to jesus the son of god.. he has never had any dealings with any other people`s or nation isn`t that some form of favouritism ?
First of all, God is not partial. "Abraham believed God and it was accounted unto him as righteousness". Abraham wasn't European. Isn't it grand that the basis of salvation is belief and not performance? - "By the works of the law shall no flesh be justified". That way, even though I can't always be obedient, I can always believe. Wow! That seems very reasonable.
Then, to get admittance into God's family (which triggers his responsibility toward us as children and heirs) all you have to do is ask Jesus for it. James said, "ye have not because ye ask not".
Instead of making peace with God, we were all trained to offend God as JW's. Jesus said over and over, "Come to me". So what did we do? We went to Jehovah instead.
God says that membership in his family is a gift. So what did we do? We worked for it instead - which only created more debt to pay off to God. We were cursed for our hard work for Jehovah. (Romans 4: 4)
We listened to and believed a two-tier salvation that the apostles never taught and were doubly cursed by that too. (Gal. 1: 8-9)
God warns over and over in his word not to put our trust in man. So what did we do? We put our trust in a governing body of men.
Jesus told us to receive his new covenant in the bread & wine at the Lord's Supper ceremony. So what did we do? We publicly rejected it at each Memorial even though Matt. 26: 27-28 specifically says it is for the forgiveness of sins.
I get it that some xjw's have a problem with God because of what the WT did to them and their families. I lost dozens of relatives myself. But, look at all the curses we brought upon ourselves! Even though I was born into it as a 4th gen JW; I still have to face the fact that I am ultimately responsible. Only by being responsible for my past can I start to be responsible about my future. We are not victims, we can still choose. We can get off the crazy train of unbelief towards God and will ourselves into his family simply by believing him.
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."
The offer to trade places with us is still available :
"For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him."
Jesus wants to be our scapegoat, if we let him. Only then can we expect anything more than general grace from God in this life.
On the other hand, He makes some very steep promises for those who do choose to believe him:
"There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my sake, and the gospel's,
But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life".
I have experienced over the last 18 years that Jesus exceeds his promises.
let me explain :.
after the creation account of the bible, tribes of people and nations began to form and spread around the land.. god first chose noah and his family to protect them as he destroys all others in the flood.. and he ticks off everyone in babel ?
and then he favours abraham and his descendants as the nation of israel culminating in the jewish lineage to jesus the son of god.. he has never had any dealings with any other people`s or nation isn`t that some form of favouritism ?
It is a brutally effective way of showing who the real God is
Brutal? Or Beautiful? The character of God and the word of God, divides people. The above statement is a perfect example.
The beauty and anchor of faith in God is captured in Isaiah 49:15:
Can a woman forget her nursing child, And not have compassion on the son of her womb? Surely they may forget, Yet I will not forget you.
When God walked among us as a man, he told us the same thing: And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand
How could anyone be considered sane that rejects a God that is so utterly devoted to his own ?
The bible answers, "For the creature was made subject to vanity". Being a slave to their own vain viewpoints, much of mankind cannot see the goodness of God. So, God gives some people what they want - freedom from himself.
Just image the level of depravity that is revealed in a person who chooses hell over the tender care from God that is comparable to a nursing mother. Let that sink in a minute.
let me explain :.
after the creation account of the bible, tribes of people and nations began to form and spread around the land.. god first chose noah and his family to protect them as he destroys all others in the flood.. and he ticks off everyone in babel ?
and then he favours abraham and his descendants as the nation of israel culminating in the jewish lineage to jesus the son of god.. he has never had any dealings with any other people`s or nation isn`t that some form of favouritism ?
Of course....that's the whole point. It's called family.
episode 203 of netflix ... i am a killer looks at the murder of christopher chavez in texas.
christopher chavez was a 22 year old ministerial servant and a born-in son of an jw elder.
after a thursday night meeting and a quick bite to eat afterwards with friends at a local restaurant, he was kidnapped, taken to a gas station and forced to drive his killers around for hours while they were in the back seat.
"So, what should you do if you see a fight?— If it is at school, you can run and tell a teacher. And if it is away from school, you can call one of your parents or a policeman. Yes, even when other people want to fight, we should be peaceable".
"True disciples of Jesus do all they can to avoid getting into fights."
The overall tone of WT rules is very pacifist on this subject. Run and tell a teacher or policeman. Wait! Aren't all the police and the military part of the government and controlled by Satan? Why should we call upon agents of Satan to deliver us from evil?
These were the kinds of questions that troubled me as a pre-teen. It made no sense. In fact, I found that (in spite of WT pacifist rearing) standing up to bullies is the best way to ensure that they leave you alone.
But, God forbid that you defend yourself and give the bully something to think about. No, don't do that. He might get mad.
"But what if you let yourself get into a fight and you win? What could happen then?— The one you beat up could come back with some friends. They might even hurt you with a big stick or a knife."
More fear.
episode 203 of netflix ... i am a killer looks at the murder of christopher chavez in texas.
christopher chavez was a 22 year old ministerial servant and a born-in son of an jw elder.
after a thursday night meeting and a quick bite to eat afterwards with friends at a local restaurant, he was kidnapped, taken to a gas station and forced to drive his killers around for hours while they were in the back seat.
The Bible thus indicates that a person may defend himself or his family if physically assaulted. He may ward off blows, restrain the attacker, or even strike a blow to stun or incapacitate him.
Too bad the WT didn't reverse their spiritual food in time for Chris Chavez to save his own life since this article came out after his murder. Sorry about that Chris.
The WT advice above, while an improvement is till pretty lame, even dangerous.
episode 203 of netflix ... i am a killer looks at the murder of christopher chavez in texas.
christopher chavez was a 22 year old ministerial servant and a born-in son of an jw elder.
after a thursday night meeting and a quick bite to eat afterwards with friends at a local restaurant, he was kidnapped, taken to a gas station and forced to drive his killers around for hours while they were in the back seat.
My JW made it very clear that I would be on my own if someone was killing me or the kids.
episode 203 of netflix ... i am a killer looks at the murder of christopher chavez in texas.
christopher chavez was a 22 year old ministerial servant and a born-in son of an jw elder.
after a thursday night meeting and a quick bite to eat afterwards with friends at a local restaurant, he was kidnapped, taken to a gas station and forced to drive his killers around for hours while they were in the back seat.
Chavez likely grew up on the Great Teacher Book. In the Chapter - "Is it Right to Fight", it covers this topic. While not outright prohibiting fighting under all circumstances, the overall gist is very pacifist. Here are some troubling statements as far as I'm concerned:
"We should not be mean to a person just because he was mean to us".
"Should you let yourself get into a fight?— Again, let’s see what the Bible says. Turn to Matthew chapter 5, verse 39. There Jesus says: “Do not resist him that is wicked; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other also to him.”
"But Jesus did not want his followers to get into fights. So he said that if someone slaps us, we should not slap him back. We should not become angry and get into a fight. If we do, we show that we are no better than the one who started the fight."
"But what if you let yourself get into a fight and you win? What could happen then?— The one you beat up could come back with some friends. They might even hurt you with a big stick or a knife."
"Yes, even when other people want to fight, we should be peaceable".
The article ends with this final thought on the matter:
"The Bible says that a disciple of Jesus “does not need to fight, but needs to be gentle toward all.”—2 Timothy 2:24.
Do you think Chavez would be alive today if he was the son of a law enforcement officer or maybe had a dad with some military training? What about if he grew up in an average gun-owning Christian family?
episode 203 of netflix ... i am a killer looks at the murder of christopher chavez in texas.
christopher chavez was a 22 year old ministerial servant and a born-in son of an jw elder.
after a thursday night meeting and a quick bite to eat afterwards with friends at a local restaurant, he was kidnapped, taken to a gas station and forced to drive his killers around for hours while they were in the back seat.
Christopher Chavez was a 22 year old ministerial servant and a born-in son of an JW elder. After a Thursday night meeting and a quick bite to eat afterwards with friends at a local restaurant, he was kidnapped, taken to a gas station and forced to drive his killers around for hours while they were in the back seat. Eventually, he was shot in the head for no apparent reason and left to die alone in a ditch. It took two days for him to die. His kidnapper was a 17 year old 5' 6" punk kid armed with a .22 pistol.
Here is a quote from the article:
There is also no indication that Chavez put up a fight... Surveillance footage shows that Chavez had a chance to fight back or to possibly escape, while in that gas station, but didn’t due to his pacifist leanings.
Do you think the article is being fair in stating that the "pacifist leanings" of the Watchtower and his JW parenting played a significant role in his murder?
w13 7/15 p. 20 “who really is the faithful and discreet slave?” revealed it was a bunch of guys in new york, back in 1919.. the apostle paul must have been un-inspired when he wrote this back in the 1st century:.
(1 corinthians 4:1, 2) “a man should regard us [all christians/paul, apollos & peter?
] as attendants of christ and stewards of god’s sacred secrets.
Marked it as a cross reference in my bible BM.... thanks!